Kanu did not deliberately jump bail, Lawyer tells court, trial adjourned

Obinwannem News Kanu did not deliberately jump bail, Lawyer tells court, trial adjourned

The court case involving the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has been adjourned to March 31, 2020, following an application filed by his lawyer, Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor asking the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja not to revoke the bail of his client with the reason that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu did not deliberately jump bail.

The Federal Government is asking the court to reject a request by the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, to restore his revoked bail.

On Friday, the counter-affidavit filed before the court by the Federal Government to oppose an application filed in April last year by Kanu seeking the restoration of his bail was obtained.

The Federal Government’s objection to the application was filed by the prosecuting counsel, Mr. Magaji Labaran, on January 17, 2020.

Recall, that Kanu, before fleeing to safety abroad after the military invasion of his home in September 2017, was being prosecuted on trumped-up charges bordering on treasonable felony for his agitation on the IPOB platform for the secession of an independent Republic of Biafra from Nigeria.

Kanu had, in an affidavit filed in support of his application, said he was “ready to stand trial if the safety of his life would be guaranteed by the Nigerian security agencies.”

He claimed he “did not jump bail and has not voluntarily abstained from his trial to warrant the revocation of his bail and the subsequent order for his arrest.”

The affidavit added that Kanu “was ever willing to stand his trial but for the unprovoked attack and bloody invasion of his residence by the Nigerian soldiers” in Afara-Ukwu, Abia State on September 17, 2017.

It stated that the “murderous raid” by the soldiers “left 28 unarmed and defenseless persons dead and many people abducted or injured.”

“That the applicant narrowly escaped death by a whisker and his subsequent and consequential absence from court was not volitional but was occasioned by the murderous invasion of his premises by the Nigerian Army,” the affidavit added.

He fled from Nigeria following soldiers’ invasion of his home in Afara-Ukwu, near Umuahia, Abia State, in September 2017. The IPOB leader, a dual citizen of Nigeria and Britain, is believed to be currently residing in the United Kingdom.

Due to his absence from court since the military invasion, Justice Binta Nyako, on March 28, 2019, revoked the bail she granted him in April 2017, ordered his arrest, and directed that the trial would continue in his absence.

By the court’s order, Kanu is expected to be arrested and brought before the court if apprehended in the country.

In response, the IPOB leader’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, on April 1, 2019, filed an application petitioning the court to restore the bail as a condition for Kanu to return to Nigeria to face trial.

But opposing the application, the Federal Government, in its counter-affidavit, maintained that Kanu, having allegedly jumped bail, was not entitled to be granted any indulgence by the court.

The counter-affidavit read, “That the defendant, in this case, is standing trial for treasonable felony and was granted bail by this honorable court.

“That the defendant has jumped bail. “That three sureties that stood for him were asked to appear before the court and show cause after several adjournments at their instance.”

It added, “That the defendant, since he jumped bail, has deliberately refused to submit to the jurisdiction of this court. “That the defendant cannot seek any indulgence from this honorable court.”

The Federal Government said, “This court is functus officio”, implying that the court could no longer take any step aimed at reversing the decision revoking the bail except by a higher court.

Nwada Ugochinyere Onyechere reporting, Obinwannem News

leave a reply

WP Radio
WP Radio